When business owners review a merchant processing statement, small individual fees can attract a surprising amount of attention.

A few dollars here. A network fee there. A charge with an unfamiliar acronym that doesn't seem to make much sense.

One example you may see is NABU, which stands for Network Access and Brand Usage and is associated with Mastercard network activity. It is one of several card-network-related charges that can appear as part of the cost of accepting card payments.

It's reasonable to question these charges.

But there's an important distinction:

Finding a small fee doesn't necessarily mean you've found the biggest opportunity to reduce your processing costs.

And focusing too much attention on one small line-item can sometimes distract from much larger questions about what accepting credit cards is actually costing your business.

Start With the Big Picture

A merchant statement can contain numerous rates, fees and abbreviations.

Some are associated with card networks. Some relate to interchange. Others may come from your processor, payment technology, gateway or additional services.

That's why evaluating your processing costs by looking at one fee—or even one advertised rate—can be misleading.

The better question is:

What is my business paying in total to accept card payments?

One useful starting point is your effective processing rate:

Total Processing Costs ÷ Total Card Processing Volume

If your business processed $50,000** in card sales during a month and your total processing costs were **$1,500, your effective processing rate would be 3.00%.

That number doesn't tell you everything.

Small Fees Still Matter

This doesn't mean small fees should be ignored.

They should be understood.

If a fee appears on your statement, you should be able to determine:

• What the fee is

• Who assesses it

• Why it applies

• Whether it changes with transaction volume or activity

• Whether it is a card-network cost, processor charge or another service-related expense

Understanding those distinctions can help you read your statement more intelligently.

But understanding a fee and identifying your biggest savings opportunity are not necessarily the same thing.

A $5 Problem vs. a Much Bigger Opportunity

Consider a hypothetical business processing $50,000 per month in credit card sales.

Suppose the owner discovers a $5 charge and spends considerable time trying to eliminate it.

Eliminating that charge would save:

• $5 per month

• $60 per year

There's nothing wrong with saving $60.

But now suppose a review of the entire payment setup identifies an opportunity equivalent to 0.50% of monthly processing volume.

On $50,000, that's:

• $250 per month

• $3,000 per year

That's already a much more meaningful financial opportunity.

But depending on the business, that still may not represent the full opportunity.

There are payment programs that, when appropriate for the business and implemented properly, can substantially reduce—or potentially eliminate much of the processing expense the business currently absorbs.

For a business processing $50,000 per month, the difference between reducing costs by $5 and changing how thousands of dollars in annual processing expense are handled can be significant.

That doesn't mean every business should move to a program designed to shift processing costs.

And it doesn't mean every business will—or should—pay zero in processing expense.

Customer experience, average ticket, industry, transaction methods, applicable requirements and the business's objectives all need to be considered.

But it does mean that the bigger question shouldn't be:

"Can I eliminate this $5 fee?"

It should be:

"What is the greatest legitimate opportunity to reduce the total cost of accepting payments?"

For one business, that opportunity may be 0.50%.

For another, it could be substantially more.

For another, an appropriately structured payment program could potentially shift much of the processing expense the business currently absorbs.

And for some businesses, the numbers may show that their existing setup is already competitive and changing it wouldn't make sense.

The numbers should determine the answer.

Where Bigger Opportunities May Be Hiding

When I review a processing statement, I'm interested in more than whether one particular fee can be removed.

I want to understand the entire payment environment.

That can include your:

• Overall effective processing rate

• Provider pricing

• Transaction volume

• Average ticket

• Card mix

• Method of accepting transactions

• Recurring monthly charges

• Equipment or software costs

• Current payment program structure

For some businesses, the opportunity may be relatively modest.

For others, changing the structure of the payment program could potentially substantially reduce the expense associated with accepting credit cards.

And depending on the business and the options available, there may be programs designed to shift much of that processing expense away from the business.

That's a much bigger conversation than whether one $5 fee can be removed.

Don't Chase the Lowest Number

There's another reason this matters.

Payment processing is frequently marketed around one attractive number:

• A lower rate.

• A lower monthly fee.

• Free equipment.

• 0% processing.

Each of those can be worth exploring.

But none should automatically determine which payment solution is right for a business.

A lower advertised rate doesn't necessarily produce the lowest overall processing cost.

Free equipment may be valuable, but equipment is only one component of the payment relationship.

And programs designed to substantially reduce or potentially eliminate the processing expense absorbed by the business can be very attractive—but they aren't necessarily appropriate for every business.

The objective shouldn't be to find the lowest-looking number.

It should be to determine which overall payment setup produces the best financial and operational result for your business.

Look at Several Months, Not Just One

Whenever possible, don't evaluate processing costs based on a single month.

Transaction volume can change.

Customer card mix can change.

Seasonality can affect results.

One-time fees can appear.

And network or program changes can affect costs over time.

Looking at multiple statements provides context and makes it easier to distinguish a recurring issue from an unusual month.

The Bigger Question

When reviewing your merchant statement, don't stop at:

"What is this fee?"

Ask:

• "What am I paying in total?"

• "Why am I paying it?"

• "Is my current payment setup still the right fit for my business?"

• "Are there meaningful opportunities to reduce my overall cost?"

• "Are there payment options that could substantially reduce the processing expense my business currently absorbs?"

And perhaps most importantly:

"If I change something, will the change actually leave my business better off?"

Those questions are much more valuable than simply hunting for the smallest fee on the page.

What Greg Would Tell a Business Owner

If you show me a processing statement with a $5 fee you don't understand, I'll help you understand it.

But I don't want to stop there.

I'd rather determine whether that $5 is distracting us from a much larger opportunity.

Maybe you're already in a competitive payment setup and there isn't a compelling reason to change.

Maybe there are areas where your processing costs can be reduced.

Or maybe there's a different payment structure that could substantially reduce—or potentially eliminate much of—the processing expense your business currently absorbs.

The numbers should determine that answer—not the sales pitch.

That's why I believe the best payment review looks at the entire picture before recommending a solution.

Understand what you're paying. Compare the options. Then decide what makes sense for your business.

Key Takeaways

Small processing fees are worth understanding—but don't confuse a visible fee with your biggest financial opportunity.

A $5 charge might be worth addressing, but a complete review may uncover an opportunity worth hundreds or thousands of dollars annually—or, for an appropriate business, a payment structure that could substantially reduce the processing expense it currently absorbs.

Look at the entire payment picture before deciding what should change.

Complimentary Payment Statement Review

If you'd like to understand what your business is actually paying to accept credit cards, SwipeLogic offers a complimentary, no-obligation payment statement review.

We'll look at the overall picture—not simply one rate or one fee—and help identify whether there may be a better option.

That could mean reducing costs, considering a different payment structure or determining that your existing setup already makes sense.

No obligation to make a change. Just an opportunity to understand the numbers.

Important Note

The $5 NABU fee shown in the accompanying graphic is an illustrative example used to demonstrate the difference between focusing on a small individual charge and evaluating the overall cost of accepting payments. It is not intended to represent a standard, fixed or typical monthly NABU charge. Actual fees and processing costs vary based on transaction activity, card network requirements, provider pricing and other factors.

Continue Learning

Coming Soon — Article 6